En av de mer anbefalelsesverdige er her.
Ikke minst fordi vitenskapsfilosofen Michael Ruse som vanlig svarer godt på spørsmålene (og Weikart er i blant enda bedre):
Richard Dawkins and others like him contend that atheism and Darwinism go hand in hand. Is he correct?
MR: Well, I have argued NO, NO, NO on this many times and have invoked Dawkins’s ire and scorn for doing so. Of course you cannot be a biblical literalist and a Darwinian, but I have often pointed out that biblical literalism is not traditional Christianity but an idiosyncratic form of American Protestant evangelical Christianity, from the first half of the nineteenth century - we now know owing much to the theology of the Seventh-day Adventists. I think Dawkins is ignorant of just about every aspect of philosophy and theology and it shows. I could go on, but I will simply say, look at my Can a Darwinian be a Christian? The answer I give is Yes, although not always easy but whoever said the important things in life are easy?
Uansett er jeg skeptisk til alle som bedriver hitling, for ikke å si nazling, som en annen nazgul. Skal man først behandle spørsmålet om vitenskapstoleranse, paradigmer og koblingen mellom evolusjonslære og livssyn, er vel amerikanerne de siste jeg skulle tiltro ansvaret for manus og programledelse.
Men de kan godt ta spesialeffektene.
